Record of Events, Legal Standing, and Today’s Unlawful Conduct

It’s time to put the facts in one place, because selective memory and avoidance only serve those who benefit from confusion.

Background: March 1st Incident

On March 1st, Brittany’s car was involved in an extremely minor traffic tap — no velocity, no visible damage, no injury.
I documented the scene in photographs and reviewed them using advanced AI image analysis. With 18 years of Photoshop expertise, I confirmed what the images clearly show: nothing that could support a legitimate damage or injury claim.

The other driver’s attorney is now employing a nuisance-suit tactic — filing a claim to pressure Progressive into settlement. Progressive has already acknowledged this for what it is.

Under Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 3-2A-02, a plaintiff must prove actual injury or property damage to recover in court. With neither present, this claim has no legal standing.

This is not about harm — it is an attempt to extract money through manufactured legal leverage, a case with near-zero chance of success when challenged.

I am not speculating. I have developed a suite of legal tools through direct, results-driven experience. These tools were first built to fight a predatory landlord who refused to repair an extremely broken stove, with a gas leak, a violation of the warranty of habitability, while executing an illegal self-help eviction, because I stood up to him.

My analysis demonstrated that his lease contained provisions so unlawful they could render all his leases null and void through a judicial declaration.

Since then, I have applied these tools to real disputes: they helped one party win a contested divorce, and I am currently assisting another person in fighting an opportunistic claim through word-of-mouth referrals.

These skills exist, in part, because Brittany was there for me during a difficult period — the same period in which I was illegally evicted. She was kind enough to help me get back on my feet, and in that time, I built two companies from the ground up:

SupportHuman.art is now preparing for full-scale exposure across Baltimore’s downtown electronic billboard system, locked in for the next 12 months in exchange for 5% equity. At market rates, that media package is worth ~$120,000, at current market rates. Brittany owns 3%, which places the present value of her stake at ~$72,000.

This company exists to help artists disrupted by AI—exactly what happened to me—and Brittany helped me build it. Calling me a “bankrupting” influence is a toxic fiction that ignores math, documents, and the actual trajectory we created together. I can back every claim with contracts, invoices, and timestamps—and would have presented them on the spot had I not been silenced in my own home under visible intimidation with a baseball bat.

(see public documentation).

My other business Aiuci.com, alongside its sister company Synsian.com, uses the bleeding skills in technology and will make a small fortune this year.

This is what your daughter helped me create. She owns a stake in it and will continue to receive royalties for the rest of her life, on top of our standing agreement: either a $14,000 payment to reimburse her for covering my rent for a year, or — if we remained together — I would cover her rent and bills for another year so she could fully pursue the work she truly wants to do.

I understand you may be skeptical, but the websites and public-facing assets are proof these are real businesses, at an exceptional level of professionalism, & — none of which existed a year ago. I did all this myself without any help from anyone other than Brittany and the people who are now funding it.

My credit took a hit to get here, but that’s a risk I accepted for myself, like many entrepreneurs.

Your outrageous hostile judgement and physical/emotional intimidation aside…

It is not a risk I will ever allow to harm Brittany.

Current Financial Reality

I have secured $60,000 in funding and built a lean freelance operation capable of covering her credit cards, rent, and bills for the next year.
Over the last four months — while Brittany has been in a prolonged emotional, financial, and physical collapse — a conventional 9–5 would never have covered our combined obligations.

I chose the route with the highest return, precisely because her stability depended on it.

Today’s Incident: Unlawful Conduct

This is a contemporaneous account of your actions today, their legal implications under Maryland law, and the risk they create for Brittany and myself.
This record exists to ensure there is no dispute about what occurred and no ability to alter or misrepresent events later.

1. Entry Under False Pretenses

You entered the premises on the representation that “her father is sick” and that this constituted an emergency.
This statement was not true and was used to gain access without prior consent.

• Md. Crim. Law § 6-402 – Criminal Trespass: Entering a dwelling without consent.

• Md. Crim. Law § 7-104 – Fraud/False Pretenses: Gaining entry through a knowingly false statement.

2. Brandishing a Weapon in a Threatening Manner

Upon entry, a baseball bat was visibly held during direct interaction with me.
The presence and handling of the bat created a reasonable perception of potential physical harm.

• Md. Crim. Law § 3-202 – Assault with a Dangerous Weapon: Threatening conduct with an object capable of causing serious injury.

3. Attempted Coercion Through Intimidation and Verbal Aggression

While in my lawful residence, I was told by Charles Hilton that I was “bankrupting his daughter.”
When I attempted to respond with evidence and invoices showing secured funds to cover all expenses, the other party, Deborah Buffalin, while holding the bat raised their voice, made the statement “You like to talk a lot,” and prevented me from speaking further.

This created an environment of reputational harm, intimidation, and the deprivation of my ability to defend myself.

• Md. Crim. Law § 3-803 – Harassment: Conduct intended to alarm, annoy, or harass without legal purpose.

• Md. Crim. Law § 3-202 – First-Degree Assault: Threatening conduct with a dangerous weapon.

4. Interference with Brittany’s Autonomy

Brittany did not request intervention. She later described herself as panicked, suicidal, and “Ripped out of my home” as a result of the incident.
The conduct materially impacted her emotional stability.

• Md. Family Law § 5-701 – Vulnerable Adult Protection: Actions that endanger a vulnerable adult’s mental health may constitute abuse or neglect.

5. Disruption of Ongoing Legal Defense

The timing and nature of your actions interfered with my ability to provide stability and focus to Brittany during active litigation in which I am assisting her.

• Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-201 – Interference with Lawful Proceedings.

Immediate Consequences of Your Actions

Your conduct creates an evidentiary basis for:

• A Peace Order petition under Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 3-1503.

• Criminal liability for trespass, assault, and harassment.

• Civil liability for emotional distress and interference with lawful proceedings.

Brittany’s documented distress, combined with physical intimidation, establishes a factual basis for court-ordered protective measures.

Notice of Position

This document is a factual preservation for potential submission to law enforcement or the court system.
Any further acts of intimidation, coercion, or misrepresentation will be documented and pursued without additional notice.